LuLaRoe Faces $164 Million Verdict in Fraud and Contract Case

A jury has ordered LuLaRoe to pay $164M after allegations of fraud and breach of contract, spotlighting financial misconduct and corporate accountability.

ByZach Barreto

|

Updated on

Group of business people having a meeting together

What Happened?

Multilevel marketing giant LuLaRoe was recently hit with a $164 million jury verdict in California state court after a contentious two-month trial. The case centered around allegations brought by Providence Industries LLC, LuLaRoe’s former clothing supplier. Known in the industry as MyDyer, Providence claimed LuLaRoe ordered tens of millions of dollars in inventory while concealing significant financial troubles.

The relationship soured after LuLaRoe allegedly diverted revenues to fund lavish lifestyles for its owners, Mark and DeAnne Stidham, instead of paying creditors. Mark Stidham reportedly told Providence, “Look guys, I am not going to pay you guys a [expletive] dime unless a judge orders me to pay it.”

The Charges

Providence’s lawsuit accused LuLaRoe of breaching its supply agreement by failing to pay invoices, leading to $33.6 million in damages for breach of contract. The supplier also alleged LuLaRoe fraudulently hid assets by funneling $33 million into shell companies, including Ghost Squadron LLC, which invested in luxury race cars, and real estate holdings like Hudsloan Land Co. LLC and Crown 12 Ranch LLC.

LuLaRoe countersued, claiming Providence had supplied defective products and overcharged them. The jury, however, rejected these arguments, finding that LuLaRoe failed to meet its contractual obligations.

The Verdict

On November 5, 2024, the Riverside County Superior Court jury awarded Providence $164 million, including $96.3 million for fraudulent inducement and $33.6 million for breach of contract. This staggering verdict highlighted LuLaRoe’s use of fraudulent transfers to shield assets from creditors.

The court found that the Stidhams siphoned funds to personal ventures, including a stake in the Swedish race car company Koenigsegg Automotive AB. These fraudulent transfers further implicated LuLaRoe in a scheme to evade financial accountability.

The Aftermath

LuLaRoe's legal woes compound its troubled reputation. The company has previously faced allegations of operating a pyramid scheme, resulting in a $4.8 million settlement with the Washington State Attorney General in 2021. Despite these setbacks, LuLaRoe maintains a devoted base of independent consultants.

Commenting on the verdict, LuLaRoe's attorney, Alex Angulo of Rutan & Tucker LLP, suggested that “post-trial motions may significantly affect the verdict.” Counsel for Providence declined to comment on the substantial jury award.

Potential Next Steps

While LuLaRoe may seek to overturn the verdict through appeals, the outcome underscores the risks faced by multilevel marketing companies operating in legally ambiguous environments. This case may prompt closer scrutiny of corporate practices aimed at shielding assets from creditors.

For Providence, the verdict signifies a hard-fought victory that sets a precedent for enforcing accountability in business contracts. As LuLaRoe’s legal battles continue, its fate remains uncertain amidst mounting scrutiny and financial liabilities.

About the author

Zach Barreto

Zach Barreto

Zach Barreto is a distinguished professional in the legal industry, currently serving as the Senior Vice President of Research at the Expert Institute. With a deep understanding of a broad range of legal practice areas, Zach's expertise encompasses personal injury, medical malpractice, mass torts, defective products, and many other sectors. His skills are particularly evident in handling complex litigation matters, including high-profile cases like the Opioids litigation, NFL Concussion Litigation, California Wildfires, 3M earplugs, Elmiron, Transvaginal Mesh, NFL Concussion Litigation, Roundup, Camp Lejeune, Hernia Mesh, IVC filters, Paraquat, Paragard, Talcum Powder, Zantac, and many others.

Under his leadership, the Expert Institute’s research team has expanded impressively from a single member to a robust team of 100 professionals over the last decade. This growth reflects his ability to navigate the intricate and demanding landscape of legal research and expert recruitment effectively. Zach has been instrumental in working on nationally significant litigation matters, including cases involving pharmaceuticals, medical devices, toxic chemical exposure, and wrongful death, among others.

At the Expert Institute, Zach is responsible for managing all aspects of the research department and developing strategic institutional relationships. He plays a key role in equipping attorneys for success through expert consulting, case management, strategic research, and expert due diligence provided by the Institute’s cloud-based legal services platform, Expert iQ.

Educationally, Zach holds a Bachelor's degree in Political Science and European History from Vanderbilt University.

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.