Law 101 for Experts: Proving or Defeating Claims of Damages
Many civil claims go to court because of disputes over whether harm occurred or how it was caused. Yet some claims are filed even though answers to these questions are fairly clear.
Instead, the parties in damages claims may be at odds over questions about the effect or magnitude of the harm done. They may dispute whether or to what extent one party should compensate the other. These are questions about damages.
When one party suffers a loss due to the actions of another party, the party suffering loss may receive monetary damages from the acting party. Typically, a defendant who loses a civil claim owes damages to the prevailing plaintiff.
Damage questions can become complex. This is why attorneys may ask expert witnesses to participate in clarifying key issues related to damages. Here, we’ll explore what experts need to know in order to navigate questions of damages, understand the most common types of damages claims involving experts, and identify the cases to which an expert can add value.
Permissible Damages in Tort and Contract Claims
Damages in tort and contract claims are often differentiated by the type of harm they redress. Broadly, all types of monetary damages fall into one of two commonly-used categories. One is compensatory damages and the other is punitive (or exemplary) damages.
Compensatory Damages
Compensatory damages are those that seek to compensate the injured party for the harm done. The goal of compensatory damages is to place the injured party as nearly as possible to the same position they were in before the harm occurred.
Compensatory damages may be further subdivided into two categories, economic and non-economic damages.
Economic Damages
Economic damages are those that one can readily calculate from invoices, receipts, bills, and other forms of evidence. Common types of economic damages awarded in tort and contract cases include:
- Compensation for medical bills related to injury or illness
- Funeral and burial expenses in the case of wrongful death
- Repair or replacement costs for damaged property
- Lost wages incurred from time taken off work to recuperate
- Losses incurred due to a breach of contract
- Any other calculable loss stemming from the act or omission at issue in the lawsuit
In addition, a breach of contract claim may involve special damages. Special damages are actual losses caused by the breach. However, they occur due to special circumstances or conditions that are uncommon, difficult to foresee, or not ordinarily predictable. An award for special damages typically requires the non-breaching party to demonstrate that the breaching party knew of the special circumstances or requirements when the contract was made.
Non-Economic Damages
The intention behind non-economic damages is to compensate the injured party for losses. Unlike economic damages, however, non-economic damages don’t typically have a paper trail of invoices and receipts from which to calculate an exact amount. Rather, the court’s or jury’s judgment, counsel’s arguments, and, in some cases, statute direct the amount awarded.
Common types of non-economic damages in civil claims include:
- Loss of care, companionship, and consortium
- Emotional distress or anguish
- Reduced enjoyment of life
- Scarring or disfigurement
- Future lost wages due to an ongoing inability to work
- Expectation damages or losses stemming from reliance on the disappointed expectation the other party to a contract would meet its agreed-upon obligations
Punitive (Exemplary) Damages
Compensatory damages are by far the most common types of damages at issue in tort and contract claims. More rare are claims for or awards of punitive damages.
The court does not award punitive damages, also known as exemplary damages, to address harm or loss. Rather, the court awards punitive damages to send a message that the defendant’s behavior ought not to be tolerated in an organized society.
Punitive damages are not available in every case. State law typically limits the type of claims that may involve punitive damages. Additionally, state law usually limits the amount of punitive damages that the court may award.
Most Common Types of Damages Claims That Involve Experts
Many damages claims are straightforward. For example, there was a smashed vehicle fender or a broken leg in an auto accident. In this case, damages are often established on the basis of car repair bills or medical bills. These types of damage claims rarely need an expert’s input.
Other damage claims are more difficult to establish. Damages claims that may call for an expert’s input include:
- A claim based on loss of business, interference with business relationships, or lost expectations of future business under a contract
- Claims involving financial misbehavior, such as mishandling of funds or faulty bookkeeping
- A claim that focuses on emotional harm or trauma and its ongoing impacts—not only treatment costs but also the impact on relationships and ability to work
- Claims in which the resulting damages amount depends on which method of appraisal or valuation of property is used
In addition, any type of damages claim subject to more than one method for understanding and calculating damages amounts may benefit from an expert’s efforts.
How Experts Can Add Value to a Damages Claim
One calculates most types of damages either according to available financial information or according to standard methods. Nevertheless, an expert can provide value in a damages dispute by understanding and explaining these methods.
Also, experts can add value by examining how one reaches proposed damages amounts. In doing so, the expert may spot current, future, or additional damages not yet accounted for in the claim. This evaluation can quickly raise the value of a damages claim and establish the expert’s value as part of the legal team.
About the author
Dani Alexis Ryskamp, J.D.
Dani Alexis Ryskamp, J.D., is a multifaceted legal professional with a background in insurance defense, personal injury, and medical malpractice law. She has garnered valuable experience through internships in criminal defense, enhancing her understanding of various legal sectors.
A key part of her legal journey includes serving as the Executive Note Editor of the Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review. Dani graduated with a J.D. from the University of Michigan Law School in 2007, after completing her B.A. in English, summa cum laude, in 2004. She is a member of the Michigan State Bar and the American Bar Association, reflecting her deep commitment to the legal profession.
Currently, Dani Alexis has channeled her legal expertise into a successful career as a freelance writer and book critic, primarily focusing on the legal and literary markets. Her writing portfolio includes articles on diverse topics such as landmark settlements in medical negligence cases, jury awards in personal injury lawsuits, and analyses of legal trial tactics. Her work not only showcases her legal acumen but also her ability to communicate complex legal issues effectively to a wider audience. Dani's blend of legal practice experience and her prowess in legal writing positions her uniquely in the intersection of law and literature.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.
Sign up nowA Sample Voir Dire: How To Qualify An Expert Witness
Download free white paperChallenging Opposing Experts: Advanced Research Techniques
Download free white paperCross Examining Expert Witnesses: The Ultimate Guide
Download free white paper
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.