Iowa Agrees to $7.5M Settlement in Medical Negligence Claim
Plaintiff, Christopher Dolan, brought suit against the state of Iowa for its governance of the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (UIHC) in connection with the hospital’s negligent medical treatment.
On December 26, 2016, Dolan and his wife went to the emergency room at Trinity Medical Center in Bettendorf, Iowa. Dolan complained of a monthlong headache, nausea, vomiting, and right eye pain. He also suffered from weeks of blurred vision and light sensitivity. A computed tomography (CT) scan revealed that Dolan likely had a tumor. Based on the diagnostic imaging, Trinity Medical Center transferred Dolan to the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (UIHC), where he was promptly admitted.
What Happened at UIHC?
At UIHC, lab tests confirmed the presence of a pituitary tumor. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a mass. Later that day, UIHC discharged Dolan with instructions to follow up with UIHC neurosurgery in two weeks.
The following day, on December 27, 2016, Dolan returned to the UIHC emergency room. He complained of a worsening headache, continued vomiting, blurred vision, and eye pain. UIHC performed a second CT scan, which reconfirmed the presence of a pituitary mass. The scan also revealed signs of “elevated intracranial pressure and a rapid expansion of the tumor to bleeding.
Despite the concerning imaging results, on December 28, 2016, UIHC discharged Dolan with advice to follow up with neurosurgery. The next day, Dolan presented at the UIHC emergency room for a third time complaining of worsening symptoms. He also complained that he was unable to keep food and medicine down. An MRI revealed that the tumor grew and had begun to hemorrhage. UIHC again admitted Dolan and scheduled him for surgery to remove the tumor the next morning.
Tumor Removal
On December 30, 2016, four UIHC physicians performed a transsphenoidal resection of the pituitary tumor on Dolan. However, while removing the tumor, the physicians discovered they had damaged Dolan’s sellar region bone and erroneously filled his left sinus. During recovery, Dolan was unresponsive, and an MRI revealed brain damage.
Post-surgery, Dolan experienced altered consciousness and gross neurological complications. As a result, Dolan had to remain in the hospital for over a year. While in recovery, he required a tracheostomy and a feeding tube. Dolan also suffered multiple complications during recovery.
On January 17, 2018, Dolan was discharged from UIHC with ongoing and long-term neurological deficits, including speech disturbance, paralysis, and other life-altering limitations.
Medical Negligence Claim Against UIHC
Dolan alleged that UIHC was grossly negligent in providing his medical treatment. He claimed that due to the medical negligence that he experienced, he is wheelchair-bound and requires constant care. In addition, Dolan claimed that his speech, motor, bowl, and bladder functions are compromised. According to Dolan, his right leg and arm are spastic and paralyzed due to negligent medical treatment. Dolan also alleged that he and his family incurred expenses related to his ongoing medical care, prescriptions, and life-supporting treatments. Finally, Dolan claimed that he and his spouse experienced a loss of wages.
In response, the state of Iowa alleged that Dolan’s complaint failed to completely and accurately summarize his extensive and detailed medical records. The state also argued that Dolan failed to exhaust all administrative remedies as required by statute. Finally, the state argued that other intervening and superseding factors contributed to Dolan’s medical problems.
More specifically, the state contended that Dolan failed to mitigate damages. Furthermore, the state argued that any recovery should not include any loss which could have been prevented with reasonable care and diligence. According to the state, Dolan’s injuries could have been caused by other forces, acts, omissions, events, preexisting conditions, or causes outside of the control of the defendants
Reaching a Settlement
On July 11, 2022, without admitting any liability, the state agreed to a $7.5 million medical malpractice settlement. The State Appeal Board of Iowa approved the settlement. The attorney general assigned 75% of the payment to UI Physicians, a UI-based medical and surgical practice. However, UI Physicians has a $5 million claim cap. Therefore, the state agreed to pay the remaining $2.5 million of the settlement.
Key Takeaways
In many states, including Iowa, medical malpractice lawyers cannot go straight to a court for relief in the event of medical negligence. Before bringing a medical malpractice action against a healthcare provider, medical malpractice lawyers must exhaust all administrative remedies. Even if the complaint is submitted to a medical review board, medical malpractice lawyers must wait for an opinion regarding the merits of the complaint before moving forward with a lawsuit.
About the author
Zach Barreto
Zach Barreto is a distinguished professional in the legal industry, currently serving as the Senior Vice President of Research at the Expert Institute. With a deep understanding of a broad range of legal practice areas, Zach's expertise encompasses personal injury, medical malpractice, mass torts, defective products, and many other sectors. His skills are particularly evident in handling complex litigation matters, including high-profile cases like the Opioids litigation, NFL Concussion Litigation, California Wildfires, 3M earplugs, Elmiron, Transvaginal Mesh, NFL Concussion Litigation, Roundup, Camp Lejeune, Hernia Mesh, IVC filters, Paraquat, Paragard, Talcum Powder, Zantac, and many others.
Under his leadership, the Expert Institute’s research team has expanded impressively from a single member to a robust team of 100 professionals over the last decade. This growth reflects his ability to navigate the intricate and demanding landscape of legal research and expert recruitment effectively. Zach has been instrumental in working on nationally significant litigation matters, including cases involving pharmaceuticals, medical devices, toxic chemical exposure, and wrongful death, among others.
At the Expert Institute, Zach is responsible for managing all aspects of the research department and developing strategic institutional relationships. He plays a key role in equipping attorneys for success through expert consulting, case management, strategic research, and expert due diligence provided by the Institute’s cloud-based legal services platform, Expert iQ.
Educationally, Zach holds a Bachelor's degree in Political Science and European History from Vanderbilt University.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.
Sign up nowA Sample Voir Dire: How To Qualify An Expert Witness
Download free white paperChallenging Opposing Experts: Advanced Research Techniques
Download free white paperCross Examining Expert Witnesses: The Ultimate Guide
Download free white paper
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.