$66 Million Boat Death Suit Spurs Insurer Dispute Over Adjuster Duties

Insurers sue Yachtinsure for allegedly refusing to adjust high-value claims, including one tied to a fatal boat accident, sparking a legal battle over obligations.

ByZach Barreto

|

Updated on

Boat accident

Clear Blue Insurance Co. and Clear Blue Specialty Insurance Co. have filed suit against Yachtinsure Services Inc. in North Carolina federal court. The insurers allege Yachtinsure failed to fulfill its contractual obligations to adjust claims exceeding $150,000, including one linked to a fatal 2021 Florida boat accident. According to the complaint, Yachtinsure had historically adjusted high-value claims and sought approval from Clear Blue for settlements over $150,000. However, in October 2024, the adjuster allegedly refused to handle such claims, citing the claim’s value as justification.

The Claims at Issue

The fatal boat accident in question led to a $66,030,000 consent judgment against Clear Blue policyholder Karen Nissim, who subsequently sued Yachtinsure and Clear Blue in Florida state court. Nissim’s suit claims the denial of her coverage violated Florida’s "anti-technical" statute, which prohibits insurers from denying claims due to technicalities unrelated to the risk assumed by the insurer. Clear Blue asserts that despite the claim’s value, Yachtinsure remained obligated to adjust the claim under the 2020 general agency agreement, which outlined Yachtinsure’s duties to underwrite, bind, service, and adjust marine and boat insurance policies.

Breach of Contract Allegations

Clear Blue contends that Yachtinsure’s refusal to defend and indemnify the insurers in the Florida litigation constitutes a breach of contract. In September 2024, Clear Blue demanded Yachtinsure fulfill its contractual duties, but Yachtinsure allegedly declined. The insurers now seek court orders compelling Yachtinsure to indemnify and reimburse all litigation-related losses, including legal fees, and affirming Yachtinsure’s duty to adjust all claims, regardless of value. According to the insurers, attempts at contractually required mediation were unsuccessful despite their good faith efforts.

Legal Representation and Case Details

Clear Blue Insurance Co. and Clear Blue Specialty Insurance Co. are represented by Moore & Van Allen PLLC, with attorneys Mark A. Nebrig, Fielding E. Huseth, Raquel Macgregor Pearkes, and Sofie T. Oldroyd. Counsel for Yachtinsure has not been disclosed. The case is filed as Clear Blue Insurance Co. et al. v. Yachtinsure Services Inc., case number 3:25-cv-00109, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina.

This legal battle underscores the critical importance of clear contractual obligations in insurance claim adjustments and the significant financial stakes tied to high-value liability claims.

About the author

Zach Barreto

Zach Barreto

Zach Barreto is a distinguished professional in the legal industry, currently serving as the Senior Vice President of Research at the Expert Institute. With a deep understanding of a broad range of legal practice areas, Zach's expertise encompasses personal injury, medical malpractice, mass torts, defective products, and many other sectors. His skills are particularly evident in handling complex litigation matters, including high-profile cases like the Opioids litigation, NFL Concussion Litigation, California Wildfires, 3M earplugs, Elmiron, Transvaginal Mesh, NFL Concussion Litigation, Roundup, Camp Lejeune, Hernia Mesh, IVC filters, Paraquat, Paragard, Talcum Powder, Zantac, and many others.

Under his leadership, the Expert Institute’s research team has expanded impressively from a single member to a robust team of 100 professionals over the last decade. This growth reflects his ability to navigate the intricate and demanding landscape of legal research and expert recruitment effectively. Zach has been instrumental in working on nationally significant litigation matters, including cases involving pharmaceuticals, medical devices, toxic chemical exposure, and wrongful death, among others.

At the Expert Institute, Zach is responsible for managing all aspects of the research department and developing strategic institutional relationships. He plays a key role in equipping attorneys for success through expert consulting, case management, strategic research, and expert due diligence provided by the Institute’s cloud-based legal services platform, Expert iQ.

Educationally, Zach holds a Bachelor's degree in Political Science and European History from Vanderbilt University.

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.