$60M Payout for LA Residents Exposed to Dangerous Methane Emissions
LADWP settles for $59.9M over a hidden gas leak affecting a vulnerable Sun Valley community, raising concerns about health, accountability, and systemic change.
The Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) has reached a $59.9 million settlement over a natural gas leak at the Valley Generating Station in Sun Valley. The gas leak, which reportedly began in 2017, was not disclosed to residents until 2020. The plaintiffs alleged that LADWP knowingly exposed the predominantly minority and low-income community surrounding the station to harmful emissions, causing symptoms such as headaches, bloody noses, and nausea. The leak was detected during a NASA flyover in 2020, prompting LADWP to repair the affected equipment and initiate daily methane monitoring. However, residents claim the agency had been aware of the leak years earlier and failed to take timely action, leaving the community vulnerable to significant health risks.
The Charges and Allegations
The consolidated litigation in Los Angeles Superior Court accused LADWP of concealing the leak for over three years. Plaintiffs argued that the agency’s negligence "knowingly poisoned" the community with methane emissions, causing physical symptoms and long-term health concerns. According to attorney Ryan Crist of the Parris Law Firm, which represents the plaintiffs, the incident reflects systemic disregard for the safety of vulnerable populations. "This is a particularly vulnerable community," Crist remarked, expressing hope that the settlement would bring meaningful relief. Six lawsuits were consolidated before LA Superior Court Judge Carolyn B. Kuhl. The litigation, which was progressing toward a bellwether trial, was resolved before reaching that stage.
The Settlement Agreement
Under the settlement agreement, the $59.9 million fund will be distributed among approximately 1,300 individuals living within four miles of the Valley Generating Station. While the exact plan for allocation is still being developed, the settlement marks a significant step toward accountability for the gas leak. LADWP stated that it took "immediate action" after the NASA flyover in 2020 brought the issue to light. The agency has since committed to demolishing outdated generator units at the station and investing $20 million in community grants to support local emission-reduction initiatives. "We at LADWP remain committed to operating our power infrastructure safely and reliably, in a way that instills trust and confidence in the communities where we live, work, and serve," the department said in a statement.
What’s Next?
The case, Pueblo y Salud Inc. et al. v. City of Los Angeles et al., continues to unfold, with a status conference scheduled before Judge Kuhl on December 19, 2024. While the settlement has provided immediate relief, questions remain about whether systemic changes will prevent future incidents.
The incident has drawn parallels to the Aliso Canyon storage well leak, which resulted in a $1.8 billion settlement. Advocates argue that stronger monitoring and preventive measures are essential to safeguard communities from similar risks. LADWP’s commitment to demolishing outdated equipment and providing community grants offers a pathway toward rebuilding trust, but it remains to be seen how these measures will impact the affected neighborhoods in the long term. The resolution of this case underscores the importance of accountability and transparency in public utilities, especially when their operations intersect with vulnerable communities. As the allocation plan takes shape, residents hope the settlement will address both the physical and emotional toll of the years-long exposure to harmful emissions.
About the author
Zach Barreto
Zach Barreto is a distinguished professional in the legal industry, currently serving as the Senior Vice President of Research at the Expert Institute. With a deep understanding of a broad range of legal practice areas, Zach's expertise encompasses personal injury, medical malpractice, mass torts, defective products, and many other sectors. His skills are particularly evident in handling complex litigation matters, including high-profile cases like the Opioids litigation, NFL Concussion Litigation, California Wildfires, 3M earplugs, Elmiron, Transvaginal Mesh, NFL Concussion Litigation, Roundup, Camp Lejeune, Hernia Mesh, IVC filters, Paraquat, Paragard, Talcum Powder, Zantac, and many others.
Under his leadership, the Expert Institute’s research team has expanded impressively from a single member to a robust team of 100 professionals over the last decade. This growth reflects his ability to navigate the intricate and demanding landscape of legal research and expert recruitment effectively. Zach has been instrumental in working on nationally significant litigation matters, including cases involving pharmaceuticals, medical devices, toxic chemical exposure, and wrongful death, among others.
At the Expert Institute, Zach is responsible for managing all aspects of the research department and developing strategic institutional relationships. He plays a key role in equipping attorneys for success through expert consulting, case management, strategic research, and expert due diligence provided by the Institute’s cloud-based legal services platform, Expert iQ.
Educationally, Zach holds a Bachelor's degree in Political Science and European History from Vanderbilt University.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.
Sign up nowA Sample Voir Dire: How To Qualify An Expert Witness
Download free white paperChallenging Opposing Experts: Advanced Research Techniques
Download free white paperCross Examining Expert Witnesses: The Ultimate Guide
Download free white paper
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.