Missed Diagnosis of Blood Clot in Pregnant Patient Results in Fatal Pulmonary Embolism
This case involves a pregnant female who presented to the emergency room at thirty-five weeks complaining of shortness of breath, chest pain, and an increased heart rate. The patient was admitted, diagnosed with pneumonia, and sent to the ICU for close observation. No additional testing or cardiovascular imaging studies were performed and the patient was transferred to a medical step-down floor. The patient died soon after her transfer and the cause of death was determined to be a massive pulmonary embolism. The physicians on the patient’s case claim that they considered the PE as a possible differential diagnosis but no further tests were done to rule out this life-threatening condition.
Question(s) For Expert Witness
1. What is the standard of care in working up a patient that presents with these symptoms?
Expert Witness Response E-006017
Clinical signs and symptoms for pulmonary embolism are nonspecific. Therefore, patients suspected of having pulmonary embolism because of unexplained dyspnea, tachypnea, chest pain, or the presence of other risk factors for pulmonary embolism must undergo diagnostic tests until the diagnosis is ascertained, eliminated, or an alternative diagnosis is confirmed. Furthermore, routine laboratory findings are nonspecific and are not helpful in pulmonary embolism, although they may suggest another diagnosis. A hypercoagulation workup should be performed if no obvious cause for embolic disease is apparent. It is more likely that a pregnant woman may be in a state of hypercoagulation, and a pulmonary embolism should not be excluded until confirmatory tests suggest otherwise.
About the author
Michael Talve, CEO
Michael Talve stands at the forefront of legal innovation as the CEO and Managing Director of Expert Institute. Under his leadership, the Expert Institute has established itself as a vital player in the legal technology arena, revolutionizing how lawyers connect with world-class experts and access advanced legal technology. Michael's role involves not only steering the company's strategic direction but also ensuring the delivery of unparalleled intelligence and cutting-edge solutions to legal professionals. His work at Expert Institute has been instrumental in enhancing the capabilities of attorneys in case preparation and execution, making a significant impact on the legal industry's approach to expert consultation and technological integration. Michael's vision and execution have positioned the Expert Institute as a key facilitator in the intersection of law and technology.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.
Sign up nowFind an expert witness near you
What State is your case in?
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.