Delayed Treatment of Stroke Results in Untimely Death

ByMichael Talve, CEO

|

Updated on

Delayed Treatment of Stroke Results in Untimely Death

This case involves a fifty-nine-year-old male who presented to the ER with complaints of slurred speech, nausea, dizziness, and a brief loss of consciousness. The patient was then transferred to a tertiary care center for a suspected cerebrovascular event. However, no workup for stroke was provided and, as a result, the patient died of a massive stroke. The patient had standing orders that included a work up for a TIA that included an MRI/MRA, echocardiogram, and a carotid doppler. These tests were scheduled for the following morning, but the patient died overnight. It should be noted that the patient was not given any type of thrombolysis, anticoagulation, or antiplatelet treatment to prevent or treat the signs and symptoms of a stroke.

Question(s) For Expert Witness

1. What is the standard treatment for stroke in the acute setting?

Expert Witness Response E-000320

inline imageThe goal for the acute management of patients with stroke is to stabilize the patient and to complete initial evaluation and assessment, including imaging and laboratory studies, within sixty minutes of patient arrival. Critical decisions focus on the need for intubation, blood pressure control, and determination of risk/benefit for thrombolytic intervention. Current treatments for acute ischemic stroke include IV thrombolytic therapy with tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) and endovascular therapies, including intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy and the use of clot retrieval devices. Newer stroke trials have shown the benefit of using neuroimaging to select patients who are most likely to benefit from thrombolytic therapy and the potential benefits of extending the window for thrombolytic therapy beyond the guideline of three hours with t-PA and newer agents.

About the author

Michael Talve, CEO

Michael Talve, CEO

Michael Talve stands at the forefront of legal innovation as the CEO and Managing Director of Expert Institute. Under his leadership, the Expert Institute has established itself as a vital player in the legal technology arena, revolutionizing how lawyers connect with world-class experts and access advanced legal technology. Michael's role involves not only steering the company's strategic direction but also ensuring the delivery of unparalleled intelligence and cutting-edge solutions to legal professionals. His work at Expert Institute has been instrumental in enhancing the capabilities of attorneys in case preparation and execution, making a significant impact on the legal industry's approach to expert consultation and technological integration. Michael's vision and execution have positioned the Expert Institute as a key facilitator in the intersection of law and technology.

Find an expert witness near you

What State is your case in?

What party are you representing?

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.