Accident reconstruction expert witness advises on trip and fall at concert

ByKristin Casler

|

Updated on

Accident reconstruction expert witness advises on trip and fall at concert

Accident reconstruction expert witness advises on a case involving a concert attendee who tripped on cables. The plaintiff was attending an empowerment conference at an arena with a group of friends when she tripped over one or more electrical cables that ran from the stage to the sound booth. She fell and suffered a serious injury. She filed suit against the production company, arena owner and conference presenter under contract and tort law.

The plaintiff asserts that she did not see the cables because of poor lighting. Further, the cables were not covered nor marked with warning tape. She alleges that the defendants breached the duty of reasonable care owed to her by either negligently placing the cables or mat in the aisle or by failing to provide adequate warning of the dangerous condition.

The defendants contend that the cables were covered with a rubber mat that had been taped down with yellow tape to warn attendees of the potential hazard.

Question(s) For Expert Witness

1. Did the cables present a hazard?

2. Did the cables and warnings meet code requirements?

Expert Witness Response

inline imageIt is my opinion that the electrical cables and coverings where the plaintiff fell were a tripping hazard due to the physical properties and dimensions of the rubber matting employed. Further, the use of such a temporary cable covering is in violation of the National Electrical Code requirement regarding the physical protection of wiring components. Appropriate hardware was readily available for such applications and should have been used in this case. The geometry and physical properties, including color, of the coverings which should have been used are important as they relate to warnings and tripping hazards; a visual reconstruction of the scene, perhaps with Jvt image manipulation, might be helpful to understand the scenario further.

inline imageThe expert relied on facts provided by the plaintiff and her attorney, the facts contained in the pleadings, discovery materials and the National Electrical Code.

inline imageThe expert is a mechanical engineer with more than 50 years of experience.

About the author

Kristin Casler

Kristin Casler

Kristin Casler is a seasoned legal writer and journalist with an extensive background in litigation news coverage. For 17 years, she served as the editor for LexisNexis Mealey’s litigation news monitor, a role that positioned her at the forefront of reporting on pivotal legal developments. Her expertise includes covering cases related to the Supreme Court's expert admissibility ruling in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc., a critical area in both civil and criminal litigation concerning the challenges of 'junk science' testimony.

Kristin's work primarily involves reporting on a diverse range of legal subjects, with particular emphasis on cases in asbestos litigation, insurance, personal injury, antitrust, mortgage lending, and testimony issues in conviction cases. Her contributions as a journalist have been instrumental in providing in-depth, informed analysis on the evolving landscape of these complex legal areas. Her ability to dissect and communicate intricate legal proceedings and rulings makes her a valuable resource in the legal journalism field.

Find an expert witness near you

What State is your case in?

What party are you representing?

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.